Extensive research has gone into understanding why people commit sexual-based offences and how to prevent them from either happening in the first place or from reoccurring. Near the end of the 20th century, various legislations have passed to prevent sex offenders from re-offending. One method used to prevent re-offending is to track the whereabouts of the individual is through the use of electronic tracking, usually by way of a Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) that is attached to the individual’s ankle. The etiology of sex offending is complex and deals with many factors that should be measured when examining ways to prevent sexual-based offences from happening. GPS tracking has also not been without controversy. While there are arguments to be made on both sides of the GPS debate, much of the research around the use of GPS devices indicate they are useful but that there are other factors that need to be measured.
The Etiology of Sex Offending involving Minors
The etiology of sex offending refers to the origin or causes of why people commit sexual-based offences. Some people who sexually abuse children, for example, are not drawn to them due to attraction (i.e., there is no Pedophilic interest involved). Instead, these individuals are drawn to children due to high sex drive, criminality, or opportunism (Seto, 2009). Other reasons for child sexual abuse can include sexually inexperienced adolescents, developmentally disabled persons, those with antisocial personality disorders (ASPDs), and perpetrators within general traumatizing family constellations, which seek surrogate partners in children (Greenberg, Firestone, Nunes, & Bradford, 2005; Rice & Harris, 2002). Those who lack the necessary social skills to develop and maintain emotional and sexual relationships with appropriately aged peers may also look to “replacement partners” in children as a kind of “surrogate” (Beier, 1998; Mokros, Osterheider, & Nitschke, 2012; Seto, 2018). The Abused Abuser theory posits that those who suffer sexual abuse as children go on to abuse children when they are adults. Research has shown that a large number of sex offenders reported sexual abuse as children (Becker, 1998; Craissati, McClurg & Browne, 2002; Graham, 1996; Jonson-Reid & Way, 2001; Seghorn, Prentky & Boucher, 1987; Veneziano, Veneziano & LeGrand, 2000; Worling, 1995; Zgourides, Monto & Harris, 1997). However, the majority of sex offenders do not report enduring sexual abuse as children (Berliner & Elliot, 2002; Putnam, 2003).
Empirical reviews of GPS tracking
GPS has both advantages and disadvantages. One distinct disadvantage is a concern of ethics. Should sex offenders lose their right to privacy when they are released because they committed a crime, even if medical professionals deemed the treatment sufficient? Many also argue that oversight and control when sex offenders are released can be intrusive and deliberately shaming (Janus, 2000; McAliden, 2005; Shaffer, 2010). Another disadvantage is that GPS devices are usually quite expensive. An advantage, however, is that GPS allows law enforcement to monitor the individual from a distance and research suggests that sex offenders who wear GPS tracking devices are less likely to re-offend than those who do not (Gies et al., 2012). Research consistently finds that one of the most significant contributors to desistance is strong social bonds and pro-social networks (Bottoms, 2006; Doekhie, Dirkzwager & Nieuwbeerta, 2017; Laub, & Sampson, 2001; Sampson, & Laub, 2003; Moore, Stuewig, & Tangney, 2016; Paternoster, Bachman, Bushway, O’Connell, 2016; Weaver, 2015). Sex offenders also have a high chance of becoming homeless due to stigma from the community and restrictions placed upon them by the state. Myers (2011c: 61) reported that 75 percent of Los Angeles’ 2000 paroled sex offenders were homeless. Homelessness then decreases accountability, decreases the ability for the individual to charge their monitoring device, and increases isolation, which increases the risk of recidivism (Bishop, 2010; Myers, 2011a). The research around desistence suggests that instead of making community notifications (leaflets, signage, a statement to the media) when a sex offender has moved into the area, the best method may be to make sure they are at no risk to re-offend and are under surveillance without notifying the community. Making the community aware that a sex offender lives among them will more than likely isolate the individual, turning them into a pariah of sorts, which increases their chance of recidivism as they will feel alone. One possibility that comes with community notification is that some members may commit criminal offences against the individual for what they had done, resulting in psychological, emotional, or physical harm, which may isolate the individual further, increasing the likelihood that the individual offends again. Research also indicates that convicted sex offenders have a lower recidivism rate than other dangerous criminals (Alper & Durose, 2019; Harris & Hanson, 2004; Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, & Baker, 2007), though one thing to keep in mind is that many sex based crimes are under reported, so the recidivism numbers may actually be higher than what is being reported.
Understanding why people commit sexual-based offences is a crucial factor in preventing sexual-based offences from happening in the first place. While more expensive than other methods, GPS tracking also appears to be effective in reducing the rate of recidivism among sex offenders. Though the usage is not without its valid criticism as issues of privacy, control, and shame are often called into question. However, research shows that secure social networks and pro-social bonds are also crucial in keeping recidivism rates among sex offenders down.
Alper, M., Durose, M., & Markman, J. (2018). Update on Prisoner Recidivism: A 9-Year Follow-up Period (2005-2014). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/18upr9yfup0514.pdf
Becker, J.V. (1998). What we know about the characteristics and treatment of adolescents who have committed sexual offenses. Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, 3, 317–329.
Beier K. M. (1998). Differential typology and prognosis for dissexual behavior – a follow-up study of previously expert-appraised child molesters. Int. J. Legal Med. 111, 133–141.10.1007/s004140050133
Berliner, L., & Elliot, D.M. (2002). Sexual abuse of children. In J.E.B. Meyers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, C.T. Hendriz, C. Jenny, & T.A. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment, 2d ed. (pp. 55–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bishop, L. (2010). The challenges of GPS and sex offender management. Federal Probation, 74(2), 33–35.
Bottoms A. (2006) Desistance, social bonds, and human agency: A theoretical exploration. In: P-O. Wikstrom and R. Sampson (2006) The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243-290.
Craissati, J., McClurg, G., & Browne, K. (2002). Characteristics of perpetrators of child sexual abuse who have been sexually victimized as children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 225–239.
Doekhie, J., van Ginneken, E., Dirkzwager, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P.(2018). Managing Risk or Supporting Desistance? A Longitudinal Study on the Nature and Perceptions of Parole Supervision in the Netherlands. J Dev Life Course Criminology 4, 491–515 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-018-0097-6
Graham, K. (1996). The childhood victimization of sex offenders: An under-estimated issue. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40(3), 192–203.
Greenberg D. M., Firestone P., Nunes K. L., Bradford J. M., Curry S. (2005). Biological fathers and stepfathers who molest their daughters: psychological, phallometric, and criminal features. Sex. Abuse 17, 39-46.10.1177/107906320501700105
Gies, S. V., Gainey, R., Cohen, M. I., Healy, E., Duplantier, D., Yeide, M., Hopps, M. (2012). Monitoring High-Risk Sex Offenders With GPS Technology: An Evaluation of the California Supervision Program, Final Report. National Criminal Justice Reference Service. doi: 10.1037/e566812012-001
Harris, A., & Hanson, R. K. (2004). Sex oﬀender recidivism: A simple question. Ottawa ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
Janus, E. (2000) ‘Civil Commitment as Social Control: Managing the risks of sexual violence’ in M. Brown & J. Pratt (2000). Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order. London: Routledge.
Jonson-Reid, M., & Way, I. (2001). Adolescent sexual offenders: Incidence of childhood maltreatment, serious emotional disturbance, and prior offenses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(1), 120–130.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding Desistance from Crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69. doi: 10.1086/652208
Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 0(0). doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007. 00119.x
Mokros A., Osterheider M., Nitschke J. (2012b). Pädophilie: prävelenz, ätiologie und diagnostik. Nervenarzt 83, 355–358.10.1007/s00115-011-3322-7
Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J. B., & Tangney, J. P. (2016). The Effect of Stigma on Criminal Offenders’ Functioning: A Longitudinal Mediational Model. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 196–218. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2014.1004035
McAlinden, A. (2005). The Use of Shame with Sexual Offenders. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(3), 373-394. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23639325
Myers, R. (2011a) ‘Monitoring sex offenders by GPS I,’ Sex Offender Law Report 12(2): 19-20
Myers, R. (2011c) ‘Monitoring sex offenders by GPS III,’ Sex Offender Law Report 12(4): 60-63
Putnam, F.W. (2003). Ten year research updates review: Child sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 269–278.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-Course Desisters? Trajectories Of Crime Among Delinquent Boys Followed To Age 70. Criminology, 41(3), 555–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125. 2003.tb00997.x
Seghorn, T.K., Prentky, R.A., & Boucher, R.J. (1987). Childhood sexual abuse in the lives of sexually aggressive offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 262–267.
Seto, M. C. (2009). Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 391-407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153618
Seto, M. C. (2018). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shaffer, D. (2010), “Sex offender registration and notification laws as a means of legal control” in J. Chriss (2010) Social Control: Informal, Legal and Medical (Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 15), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 43-63.
Veneziano, C., Veneziano, L., & LeGrand, S. (2000). The relationship between adolescent sex offender behaviors and victim characteristics with prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 363–371.
Weaver, B. (2015). Offending and Desistance: The importance of social relations. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. doi: 10.4324/9781315755915
Worling, J.R. (1995). Adolescent sex offenders against females: Differences based on the age of their victims. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 276–293.
Zgourides, G., Monto, M., & Harris, R. (1997). Correlates of adolescent male sexual offense: Prior adult sexual contact, sexual attitudes, and use of sexually explicit materials. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41, 272–283.